Kenya project in English

Introduction

The Up­per Se­con­da­ry School of Fors­sa (Fors­san yh­teis­ly­seo, la­ter FYL) was es­tab­lis­hed in 1899, thus being the ol­dest ru­ral se­con­da­ry school in Fin­land. FYL has now about 520 stu­dents, and they are 16 to 19 of age.

The Ro­ta­ry Dist­rict 1410 and two Ro­ta­ri­an clubs star­ted with FYL the de­ve­lo­ping pro­ject with two Ke­nyan up­per se­con­da­ry schools in 2007. The pro­ject en­ded in 2010. Be­cau­se the ro­ta­ry clubs and Ke­nyan schools wan­ted to con­ti­nue and ex­tend co-ope­ra­ti­on, NGO Pro Ke­nia (Pro Ke­nia 2010, the home add­ress of the so­cie­ty is FYL) was es­tab­lis­hed in 2009 by key imp­le­men­ting per­sons of the backg­round pro­ject. The Ro­ta­ry Dist­rict 1410, the ra­o­ta­ri­an clubs,FYL and NGO Pro Ke­nia star­ted the new pro­ject in 2011.

The area

Anin se­con­da­ry school is si­tu­a­ted in Ke­rio Val­ley of Keiyo Dist­rict in Rift Val­ley pro­vin­ce of Ke­nya, about 350 km to the west of Nai­ro­bi. Anin rep­re­sents ty­pi­cal ru­ral vil­la­ge com­mu­ni­ty in less de­ve­lo­ped ru­ral are­as of Wes­tern Ke­nya. Most of stu­dents to Anin school are co­ming from poor Ke­rio Val­ley area, whe­re part of pe­op­le still are li­ving more in  no­ma­dic way.  The backg­round pro­ject was a ca­ta­ly­ser to boost Anin to be con­nec­ted to main po­wer supp­ly.

Con­se­qu­ent­ly, the who­le vil­la­ge was con­nec­ted to elect­ri­ci­ty in 2008. The pro­cess con­ti­nu­es in ne­ar­by vil­la­ges. Anin se­con­da­ry school ac­com­mo­da­tes 380 stu­dents, equ­al­ly boys and girls, ne­ar­ly all of them staying in the school dor­mi­to­ries over the who­le se­mes­ter. The school has 12 te­ac­hers. The school was es­tab­lis­hed 20 ye­ars ago and has de­ve­lo­ped her fa­ci­li­ties ra­pid­ly sin­ce that sho­wing good com­mit­ment of the com­mu­ni­ty be­hind the school. The backg­round pro­ject pro­vi­ded 30 com­pu­ters for the school. The school is wit­hin wi­re­less con­nec­ti­on and in­ter­net con­nec­ti­on.

Che­pals­kei se­con­da­ry school is si­tu­a­ted in Rift Val­ley pro­vin­ce War­reng Dist­rict (pre­vi­ous­ly Uas­hin Gis­hu) ten ki­lo­met­res from El­do­ret cent­re, only two ki­lo­met­res out­si­de of city bor­der clo­se to Na­ku­ru high­way le­a­ding to Nai­ro­bi. Due to good road con­nec­ti­ons and vi­ci­ni­ty of El­do­ret Chep­las­kei is re­a­so­nab­ly well de­ve­lo­ped as ru­ral lo­ca­ti­on (na­tu­ral­ly not at le­vel of ur­ban com­mu­ni­ties). Main con­cern in the area is unp­lan­ned growth of po­pu­la­ti­on and mu­ni­ci­pa­li­ty is gro­wing wit­hout const­ruc­ting pro­per was­te pro­ces­sing or wa­ter supp­ly uti­li­ties. The unp­lan­ned na­tu­re of fast ur­ban growth in pe­rip­he­ries of El­do­ret has cre­a­ted se­ve­re const­raints for ur­ban plan­ning, inc­lu­ding li­mi­ting the pro­vi­si­on of es­sen­ti­al ser­vi­ces in wa­ter, sa­ni­ta­ti­on, ac­cess ro­ads and edu­ca­ti­on fa­ci­li­ties.

The en­ga­ge­ment in ICT, the­re­fo­re is ai­med at inc­re­a­sing the cont­ri­bu­ti­on of par­ti­ci­pa­ting schools in their phy­si­cal plan­ning ef­forts, and the part­ners­hip in pro­vi­si­on of es­sen­ti­al ser­vi­ces, star­ting with wa­ter/sa­ni­ta­ti­on as a pi­lot examp­le on how plan­ning could be en­han­ced. Chep­las­kei se­con­da­ry school ac­com­mo­da­tes 200 boys, ne­ar­ly all of them staying in the school dor­mi­to­ries over the who­le se­mes­ter. The school is si­tu­a­ted 10 km from El­do­ret City cent­re and just 2 km out­si­de the city bor­der ma­king the school pri­vi­le­ged to city ser­vi­ces. The school has 15 te­ac­hers. School was es­tab­lis­hed in 1987. The school has well es­tab­lis­hed fa­ci­li­ties for edu­ca­ti­on inc­lu­ding a class­room with 30 com­pu­ters pro­vi­ded by the backg­round pro­ject.

Anin and Chep­las­kei schools as well as most ot­her schools in the area pro­vi­de all the ba­sic school fa­ci­li­ties, inc­lu­ding sa­la­ries of te­ac­hers, sup­por­ting la­bour, school inf­rast­ruc­tu­re like buil­dings and elect­ri­ci­ty. Only to­tal of two tem­po­ra­ry com­pu­ter te­ac­hers will be hi­red by the pro­ject funds, and only the costs di­rect­ly re­la­ted to com­pu­ters and get­ting con­nec­ted to mo­dern IT-con­tacts, will be co­ve­red by the pro­ject. Con­se­qu­ent­ly, vast ma­jo­ri­ty of the costs re­la­ted to the backg­round pro­ject have been co­ve­red by the lo­cal com­mu­ni­ties. Sa­la­ries of te­ac­hers are co­ve­red by Mi­nist­ry of Edu­ca­ti­on of Ke­nya, this rep­re­sents 30 % of to­tal costs of the schools. The re­mai­ning 70 % is co­ve­red by the com­mu­ni­ty and school fees of the stu­dents. An ave­ra­ge an­nu­al school fee per stu­dent is 20 000 KSh (appr. 200 € ).

Dist­rict Edu­ca­ti­on Of­fi­ce, the res­pon­sib­le go­vern­men­tal body to su­per­vi­se and inst­ruct edu­ca­ti­on at Dist­rict le­vel, both in Keiyo and War­reng Dist­ricts has exp­res­sed strong sup­port to the Pro­ject con­cept and is en­cou­ra­ging the Pro­ject to con­ti­nue her ac­ti­vi­ties.

Political situation in Kenya in 2007

Na­ti­o­nal ICT Stra­te­gy for Edu­ca­ti­on and Trai­ning in Ke­nya sti­pu­la­tes how ICT will be adop­ted and uti­li­zed to imp­ro­ve ac­cess, qu­a­li­ty and equi­ty in the de­li­ve­ry of edu­ca­ti­on ser­vi­ces in Ke­nya. The Stra­te­gy is ba­sed on the vi­si­on that: “ICT is a uni­ver­sal tool in edu­ca­ti­on and trai­ning”. The mis­si­on sta­te­ment that ins­pi­res it is: “to in­teg­ra­te ICT in edu­ca­ti­on and trai­ning to imp­ro­ve ac­cess, le­ar­ning and ad­mi­nist­ra­ti­on.” The ove­rall ob­jec­ti­ve of the plan is to en­su­re that sys­te­ma­tic ef­forts are made to­wards strengt­he­ning adop­ti­on and use of ICT in the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor with app­rop­ri­a­te at­ten­ti­on gi­ven to edu­ca­ti­on de­ve­lop­ment pri­o­ri­ties.

The backg­round comp­lied per­fect­ly with the­se go­als and, con­se­qu­ent­ly en­vi­ron­ment to imp­le­ment is fa­vo­rab­le. Na­ti­o­nal prog­ram is at the mo­ment only ta­king ear­ly steps to meet her go­als, and main­ly well re­sour­ced schools in ci­ties have been able to join the prog­ram. The­re­fo­re the pro­po­sed Pro­ject is comp­le­men­ting Na­ti­o­nal prog­ram as the aim of the Pro­ject is to con­cent­ra­te in less re­sour­ced schools in ru­ral are­as. The po­li­ti­cal si­tu­a­ti­on in Ke­nya has been very uns­tab­le, and the cor­rup­ti­on has been a big prob­lem in Ke­nya. In 2007, the ge­ne­ral elec­ti­ons took pla­ce in Ke­nya. In the “be­low in­ter­na­ti­o­nal stan­dard” elec­ti­ons, pre­si­dent Ki­ba­ki was re-elec­ted. Af­ter the elec­ti­ons, the pro­test es­ca­la­ted into vi­o­len­ce. Hund­reds of thou­sands were for­ced off their land to re­la­ti­ves el­sew­he­re in the count­ry. For ins­tan­ce, two te­ac­hers of the Anin school had to le­a­ve the school. The fu­tu­re of the backg­round pro­ject was unc­le­ar. In 2008, the con­di­ti­ons cal­med when pre­si­dent Ki­ba­ki and Mr. Odin­ga sig­ned an ag­ree­ment on the for­ma­ti­on of a co­a­li­ti­on go­vern­ment. In 2010, the new cons­ti­tu­ti­on pas­sed in a re­fe­ren­dum. It has been as­su­med to be very sig­ni­fi­cant re­sult for the pe­a­ce­ful fu­tu­re in Ke­nya. The next par­li­a­ment elec­ti­ons will take pla­ce in 2012. It seems to be pro­bab­le that our new pro­ject will be ac­cep­tab­le by both big po­li­ti­cal par­ties. Thus, our pro­ject seems to be suc­cess­ful in spi­te of the re­sults of the next elec­ti­ons.

Ke­nia27.2.2014